Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Case IPR2012-00022 (Aug. 7, 2013) (Paper 55) & Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd. (Aug. 29, 2013) (Paper 67)

Takeaway: The Board in this decision sets forth guidelines for conducting depositions in a foreign language.

Click Here For Copy of Decision

Takeaway:

The Board in this decision sets forth guidelines for conducting depositions in a foreign language. Continue reading “Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Case IPR2012-00022 (Aug. 7, 2013) (Paper 55) & Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd. (Aug. 29, 2013) (Paper 67)”

Bloomberg, Inc. v. Markets-Alert Pty, Ltd., CBM2013-00005, (May 29, 2013) (Paper 32)

Takeaway: The factors set forth in Garmin International, Inc. et al. v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC, IPR 2012-00001, Paper No. 26 at 6-7 (PTAB, Mar. 5, 2013) also apply to CMB’s for determining whether additional discovery is necessary for “good cause.”

Click Here For Copy of Decision

Takeaway:

The factors set forth in Garmin International, Inc. et al. v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC, IPR 2012-00001, Paper No. 26 at 6-7 (PTAB, Mar. 5, 2013) also apply to CMB’s for determining whether additional discovery is necessary for “good cause.” Continue reading “Bloomberg, Inc. v. Markets-Alert Pty, Ltd., CBM2013-00005, (May 29, 2013) (Paper 32)”

Garmin Int’l Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC,, Case IPR2012-00001 (Mar. 5, 2013) (Paper 26)

Takeaway: The Board set forth five factors that should be used to determine whether discovery requests should be granted as “necessary in the interest of justice.”

Click Here For Copy of Decision

Takeaway:

The Board set forth five factors that should be used to determine whether discovery requests should be granted as “necessary in the interest of justice.” Continue reading “Garmin Int’l Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC,, Case IPR2012-00001 (Mar. 5, 2013) (Paper 26)”